From http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/12/3...
BI
Plans $1 Billion Biometric Database
by
Ronald Reagan ( mmmmtmmmm
[at] gmail.com )
Wednesday Dec 26th, 2007 6:39
PM
The FBI
announced that they are spending $1 billion to create the
world's largest & most comprehensive biometric
database. The database will contain voice samples,
fingerprints, DNA samples, data about each individuals
unique "body language", iris scans, & detailed
information about facial features. This article will
discuss this & several other programs and laws in place
to violate your privacy and strip you of personal freedoms.
Bigger.
Faster. Better?
The latest in a
long chain of domestic surveillance laws, programs, and
"presidential directives" is the recent unveiling of the
FBI's new national biometric
security
database. The federal government is planning to spend over
$1 billion to create and maintain a database, accessible to
law enforcement agencies nationwide, that will contain,
amongst other things:
• Fingerprints
• DNA samples
• Iris scans(what your eyes
look like -- at a range of up to about 15 feet)
• The unique way your body moves as you walk, talk, sit,
etc (useful for
identifying people in crowds, from hundreds of yards away
on surveillance cameras)
• Detailed information on how your face looks
(remember those
cameras they use to film protests?)
• Sample recordings of your voice (pulled from
their CALEA-compliant
recordings of your phone calls)
This information will be gathered from a wide variety of
sources, and will be stored in an underground facility that
is about the size of two football fields.
Of course, they have promised to use this responsibly, and
said that they are working very hard to make sure that it
doesn't interfere with your personal freedoms. The director
of the FBI's Criminal
Justice Information Services Division
said
that this new database was
"Bigger. Faster. Better." than anything
currently in existence. The first two words are most
definitely an accurate description. It's that last one that
I don't believe is true. Basically, it comes down to
whether or not you trust the U.S. government to do the
right thing (you know, the one that routinely tortures
people, spends around $500 billion each year on tools of
death and destruction, and allows factories to dump
millions of tons of toxic waste into your water each year).
Here are a couple of articles on the FBI's new pet project
& biometrics in general:
•
"FBI
biometrics database" -- Google News
•
Biometrics
(Wikipedia)
•
Introduction
To Biometrics (US Government)
The biometric database is only one of a wide range of
policies that have recently been carefully slipped under
the noses of the American people, who are currently
distracted with electioneering politicians and holiday
shopping sprees. In this article, I'd like to discuss
several of these policies and how they are quickly
dissolving your personal freedoms.
Total
Information Awareness
Before we
discuss the new biometric database, let's put it into the
context of other domestic surveillance programs and laws
that are currently in effect. These programs are often
discussed in isolation, sometimes ignoring the connections
between them. But they are all coming from the same people,
and are all working towards a single goal.
What
is the ultimate goal of these sorts of programs?
That
is, in which direction is the U.S. government trying (and
succeeding thanks to our tacit compliance) to take us with
these programs? To understand this, we only need to look to
what was previously known as the Information
Awareness Office (IAO). The proposed
goal of the IAO was to achieve what is known as "total
information awareness". This is a fancy way of saying that
they are working towards developing systems that can gather
information about the whereabouts and communications of the
entire population, and quickly analyze the data to identify
"threats", using advanced computer systems. That is, they
want to
completely remove any
possibility of privacy -- they want to know
everything (TOTAL
information
awareness). They want to know what everyone is saying at
all times, so that there is absolutely no possibility of
resistance to their rule.
Like the School Of The
Americas (now called the
"Western Hemisphere Institute For Security Cooperation"),
and COINTELPRO
(I
don't know what they call it now, but we all know they
haven't stopped infiltrating and disrupting activist
groups) -- the IAO also had a name change once it fell
under the public eye, but all of the programs are still
being funded and developed at places such as the Department
of Homeland Security's Centers of
Excellence.
Some
of these programs include, amongst several
others:
• Speech-to-Text Software
Software used
in transcribing your voice communications into
computer-readable text. This allows them to use computers
more effectively, to automatically scan the billions of
phone communications they intercept each day. Right now,
this task requires a large number of human operators to
listen to the calls and identify "threats", so it is very
slow and inefficient. Once these technologies are
developed, they can have supercomputers convert all of your
calls into text (much easier to write computer software to
analyze text than audio), which can be automatically
scanned for subversive or threatening phrases, and can then
be promptly reported to law enforcement agencies.
•
• Human Identification at a Distance
These are
technologies that use previously recorded data (from the
biometric database we mentioned earlier) regarding your
body language and facial features to identify people out of
crowds from surveillance cameras. Each person has a unique
way of walking, unique postures when sitting, unique ways
of moving their arms and hands as they speak to people.
This data will be fed through supercomputers to analyze the
information collected from the nationwide network of
surveillance cameras, and determine who everyone in the
footage is. Detailed data on peoples faces and eyes will
also be used including the structure and shape of the face,
the unique shape of your iris, and the way you smile and
move your mouth as you speak.
•
• Scalable Social Network Analysis
By monitoring
who everyone is communicating with and what they are saying
to eachother, they are creating maps of social networks.
Mapping social networks is a fancy way of saying that they
know everyone you interact with, what your relationship to
them is, and what you have said to them. They use this
information to create a "map" -- i.e. a detailed diagram or
list -- of the connections between you and everyone in your
"social network" -- i.e. your group of friends, family, and
co-workers. This can be used to keep track of activist
groups and individuals. Radicals and activists who might
not be open about their views in public, and would normally
go unnoticed by the authorities, can be rooted out if the
computers notice them communicating with people who are in
a radical social network. That is, if they talk to enough
radicals, even if they don't say anything radical, they
will be added to the social network -- radical by
association if you will.
•
• Effective Analysis Across Heterogeneous
Databases
This one might
not be clear if you've never programmed a computer before,
so I'll try to put it into simple terms. When you write a
computer program to extract and analyze text data, you --
the programmer -- have to tell the program exactly how the
data to be extracted will be formatted in the "database"
(which could be an email, web page, or word document), and
then tell it what to do with that data once it has been
extracted. The internet is a mish-mash of data in an
infinitely complex array of different formats. Each person
has their own unique writing style, people often use
incorrect grammar, web sites are organized and formatted
differently, etc. This makes it very hard to write a
computer program that can scan the entire internet to
monitor what everyone is writing (although writing it for a
*specific* individual site such as MySpace or LiveJournal
is relatively simple, and is already a well-developed
reality). The kind folks at the former IAO are working to
develop capabilities to efficiently collect data from all
websites, emails, phone calls, etc., store the information
into a single centralized database in a simple,
machine-readable format, and develop tools to quickly scan
through all of this information for "threat indicators".
•
This is just a taste of the things they are cooking up
to defend "freedom" and protect the "homeland". Most of
these technologies are already very highly developed and in
use today -- the main function of the IAO is to improve
them, and most importantly, centralize all of the data into
a singular database to increase efficiency.
This might
sound like something you read in "1984" or "Brave New
World" -- it's far worse. Orwell and Huxley wrote these
books far before the introduction of modern computers,
telecommunication technology, forensic analysis (DNA,
fingerprints, etc) and video surveillance technology. They
couldn't have possibly imagined the extent to which
technology invade our lives, and enable the State to strip
it's subjects of privacy and personal freedom. This is not
science fiction, its reality. It's happening right now, and
only gets further developed and more effective with each
passing day of apathy and inaction.
Here are a few links
regarding the IAO, and current research that is taking
place in these fields:
◦ Information
Awareness Office (Wikipedia)
◦ Total
Information Awareness
◦ Center For
Dynamic Data Analysis
◦ CITeR -
Center for Identification Technology
Research
◦ NSA Wiretap
Technology
◦ Connecting
The Corporate Dots
◦ Network
Weaving (Social Networking)
◦ The Role Of
Mathematical Sciences In Homeland
Security
•
Data
Collection
The
IAO projects require an extensive program of data
collection to feed the information into their database for
analysis, and a set of laws to allow the collection of this
data. One such law -- the Communications Assistance For Law
Enforcement Act (CALEA) -- has been in effect since the
reign of Clinton in the late '90s. Essentially, CALEA
states that every telecommunications company (AT&T,
Sprint, Verizon, Cingular, and the like) are all required
under federal law to install specially-designed
supercomputers (called NarusInsight)
in their offices that route ALL electronic communications
(phone calls, emails, which web sites you visit --
EVERYTHING electronic) to federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. The communications are transmitted
over a private nationwide network known as
DCSNET,
which is run by Sprint Corporation under contract from the
federal government. DCSNet is basically their own private
internet, which transmits nothing but intercepted
communications, creating a "point-and-click" surveillance
system, which allows federal agents to instantly pull up
communications data any person in the U.S. You might have
heard about this due to the ongoing legal
battle between
the Electronic
Frontier Foundation and AT&T,
regarding AT&T installing these computers in their
offices in San Francisco.
If not, read about it. It will
change the way you feel when talking on the phone -- it
feels a lot different when you know a federal agent is on
the line with you.
None of this requires a warrant, or
subpoena or any other such irritating legal trivialities.
Sure, it's unconstitutional, but that's just a piece of
paper anyway -- and a piece of paper doesn't mean anything
to someone with nuclear weapons. They know that nobody is
actually going to do anything about it other than
complaining. They are listening to everyone now, regardless
of who you are or where you are from. And ALL
telecommunication providers are required to install the
equipment, which means that there is not a SINGLE thing you
write, view, or say over an electronic medium that is not
recorded and analyzed by the federal government. But don't
worry -- they've promised to use it responsibly.
It is
important, regardless of whether you do trust the FBI or
not, that you at least realize that everything you say or
do on the internet or phone IS being watched. And not in
the science-fiction future -- RIGHT NOW. This is especially
important to activists and other such people who
communicate via email or cell phones, and chronicle their
activities on sites like MySpace, LiveJournal, or Blogger.
Posting personal information on these sites equivalent to
writing your own FBI profile. Do you really want to share
what you are doing, feeling, and thinking with Federal Law
Enforcement agents?
There are numerous other data
collection and analysis programs such as
(ECHELON
and
Carnivore)
that are in effect at the moment, or have been in the past
(and are likely still operating under different names) that
have the same purpose -- collecting, storing, and analyzing
electronic communications. Domestic surveillance is nothing
new -- it's something that all governments have done -- but
it is getting more extensive every day as scientists
further develop surveillance technologies.
There are too
many of these programs to discuss here, and due to their
nature are far too complex to fully explore in one article.
But there is ample information about much of it on the
internet. Below are some links regarding CALEA and DCSNET,
and a few other large-scale domestic surveillance programs,
that the U.S. public is aware of:
◦ CALEA
◦ Point, Click,
Eavesdrop -- Wired Magazine
◦ Inside
DCSNet
◦ ECHELON:
America's Secret Global Surveillance
Network
◦ ECHELON
(Wikipedia)
◦ Carnivore
(Wikipedia)
◦ Carnivore
FOIA Documents
◦ TEMPEST:
Electromagnetic Emanation Monitoring
•
NSPD-51:
Catastrophic Emergency
So
they're listening to everything you say. Some people don't
seem to feel threatened by this (which is scary in it's own
right). They say, "I haven't broken any laws, so they can
listen all they want." The problem is that George W. Bush
has been tossing out "presidential directives" and
"military orders" which are quickly making "laws" a thing
of the past. With "National
Security Presidential
Directive/NSPD-51" He has
"legally" granted himself the ability to impose a state of
martial law, during what he calls a "catastrophic
emergency", which he defines as:
◦
any incident, regardless of location, that results in
extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or
disruption severely affecting the U.S. population,
infrastructure, environment, economy, or government
functions
•
That sounds like it covers quite a few situations, doesn't
it? I suppose that a large scale protest like those
directed against the WTO in Seattle, or even a
Critical
Mass ride, could be
construed to be something that causes "mass disruption"
that severely affects the "infrastructure, economy, and
government functions". He also threw natural disasters and
a whole host of other things in there. The point is that a
"catastrophic emergency" is any event that he tells us is a
"catastrophic emergency".
What is he allowed to do during
these times of "catastrophic emergencies"? Well, he speaks
in very broad terms in the "directive", and there is a
"classified" section which the public is not able to see
(interesting that "our" government won't allow us to see
what it is doing) but a few things are clear:
◦
The President shall lead the activities of the Federal
Government for ensuring constitutional government. In order
to advise and assist the President in that function, the
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and
Counterterrorism (APHS/CT) is hereby designated as the
National Continuity Coordinator. The National Continuity
Coordinator, in coordination with the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), without
exercising directive authority, shall coordinate the
development and implementation of continuity policy for
executive departments and agencies. The Continuity Policy
Coordination Committee (CPCC), chaired by a Senior Director
from the Homeland Security Council staff, designated by the
National Continuity Coordinator, shall be the main
day-to-day forum for such policy
coordination.
That is, the
president is in charge during this time. And he and his
advisory commitee (who he has chosen) will decide what
happens. Notice that the meddling legislators and judges
are left out of the equation...
◦
◦ As far as the
other branches of government, he mentions that the
"Enduring Constitutional Government" will be
"coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity
with respect to the legislative and judicial
branches".
"Comity"
means that he is promising that although he is not granting
them any power during this "emergency" he promises that he
will respect their wishes. Of course, this is a president,
like each president before him, he doesn't exactly have the
best track record in the honesty department. So I'm not
sure how much this promise is worth...
◦
◦ His stated
purpose is:
"Protecting against threats to the homeland and
bringing to justice perpetrators of crimes or attacks
against the United States or its people, property, or
interests"
Note that he
mentions
domestic enemies (that
means you), and that you don't have to attack people or
property to be an enemy. It applies to attacking INTERESTS
as well. That means saying the wrong things, putting
graffiti on a federal highway overpass, or throwing a pie
at a politician makes you an "enemy". And we know what
happens to his "enemies" ... torture camps, indefinite
imprisonment without trial, etc.
◦
◦
Federal Government ... plans and operations shall be
appropriately integrated with the emergency plans and
capabilities of State, local, territorial, and tribal
governments, and private sector owners and operators of
critical infrastructure, as appropriate, in order to
promote interoperability and to prevent redundancies and
conflicting lines of authority. The Secretary of Homeland
Security shall coordinate the integration of Federal
continuity plans and operations with State, local,
territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector
owners and operators of critical infrastructure, as
appropriate, in order to provide for the delivery of
essential services during an
emergency.
That is, he's
in charge of all of the resouces at the state, local, and
tribal level too. He is just making clear that he is in
control of every single thing in the country, no matter
whose is normally in control of it. He wants it ALL.
◦
◦
Vital resources, facilities, and records must be
safeguarded, and official access to them must be
provided
...AND...
Provision
must be made for the acquisition of the resources necessary
for continuity operations on an emergency
basis
That is, he
can take as much money as he needs to ensure "continuity",
and can take over any "vital resources, facilities, or
records" that he says he needs. Exactly what "resources,
facilities, and records" is he talking about? Doesn't
really specify that does it. Well I guess that means that
he has access to whatever he says he needs to maintain
"continuity" -- which is everything (if he wants it to be).
•
These and a
whole host of other powers are granted to him (by him),
whenever he decides that there has been a "catastrophic
emergency", which is anytime he wants it to be. That is,
whenever he feels like it, our president can declare
martial law, with himself as supreme commander
of...well...just about everything.
Modern
Day McCarthyism
Besides
the president's self-granted ability to declare martial
law, there are other things in the works. The president
isn't the only one who's up to no good. The U.S. House of
Representatives just recently passed U.S. House
Resolution 1955, also known as
the " The Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2007". This law, which was passed by a
404 to 6 vote in the House of Representatives, is
legalizing the creation of a modern day McCarthy
Commission whose function
is to root out "violent radicals" and "homegrown
terrorists". It was passed under a "suspension of
rules", so that it
could quickly be passed without being noticed, and received
very little media coverage.
Like the "enemies" of Bush's
NSPD-51, you don't actually have to do anything violent to
be considered a violent radical.
They have defined
"violent radicalization" as:
the
process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system
for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based
violence to advance political, religious, or social
change.
And "homegrown
terrorism" is defined as:
the
use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence
by a group or individual born, raised, or based and
operating primarily within the United States or any
possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the
United States government, the civilian population of the
United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of
political or social objectives.
So you don't
actually have to do anything illegal -- just "promoting"
(talking about) or "adopting" (believing in) something that
their anti-radical "Commission" deems as an extremist view,
makes you into a "terrorist". This means you lose all of
your supposed constitutional rights, and can be tried by
the "Commission" instead of a civilian court.
Here are
some links regarding HR1955:
◦ GovTrack:
Full Text Of HR 1955
◦ House Passes
Thought Crime Prevention Bill
◦ Third World
Traveller: A Growing Threat To Civil
Liberties
•
HR 1955 is very similar to President Bush's
military
order regarding "enemy combatants" which
states:
Given
the danger to the safety of the United States and the
nature of international terrorism, and to the extent
provided by and under this order, I find ... that it is not
practicable to apply in military commissions under this
order the principles of law and the rules of evidence
generally recognized in the trial of criminal cases in the
United States district courts.
That is he can
imprison and torture (he calls it "enhanced" interrogation)
any foreigner he wants without evidence and without a
trial. Why? Because it's not "practicable" to give them a
fair trial or provide evidence. It's more "practical" for
him to just be able to call someone an "enemy combatant",
and have them tortured, imprisoned, or killed.
US House
Resolution 1955 is essentially the same law directed
towards U.S. citizens instead of foreigners, which gives
the "commission" the ability to do the same to any U.S.
citizen that they deem to be a "violent radical" -- without
being impaired by such "impractical" processes like
providing evidence or a trial by jury.
Interestingly,
they've also been developing a program known as
Federal and
Local Cops Organized Nationally (FALCON)
which is merging
the local, state, and federal police apparatus and putting
them under the direction of our leaders in Washington. They
have at this time performed four large "sweeps" where they
have practiced working together and arresting 10000-15000
people at a time, from all over the nation, for various
crimes. As far as they've reported most of these crimes are
not "political" crimes, but what is scary about it is the
fact that once they get their "violent radical" removal
commission running, they will have a well-developed,
thoroughly tested program for quickly arresting tens of
thousands of these "homegrown terrorists" at once --
similar to Stalin's purges of political dissidents in
Soviet Russia.
So now we're back to the FBI's new
"biometric database". What does this mean for you? It means
that even if you keep your mouth shut over the phone, and
don't write anything "radical" or "subversive" in your
emails or on your MySpace page, you are still being watched
every time you walk out the door. It means that every time
you walk past a government-owned surveillance camera, or
every time a police car drives by (they all have
surveillance cameras inside them), your information will be
checked against a centralized database of suspected
"terrorists" and "radicals". Like them monitoring your
phone calls, this is according to some people, "not a
problem" as long as you aren't doing anything "illegal".
But now that Bush's "presidential directives" have given
him the power to suspend the "principles of law and the
rules of evidence", as he puts it, there is no way for you
to know whether or not you've done anything illegal until
the president, his military tribunal, or the anti-radical
"commission" have told you so.
You live in a nation where
all of your private communications are monitored,
surveillance cameras are storing information about your
body language in a government supercomputer, thousands of
spy satellites are watching you from overhead, the
"Commander and Chief" can arbitrarily impose a state of
martial law any time he chooses, they are developing
systems to arrest thousands of people at once & giving
the federal government control of the local and state
police apparatus, political activism and radical speech are
now equated to "homegrown terrorism", and you can be
imprisoned & tortured indefinitely without a trial.
These are the things they openly admit to -- what do you
think they are doing that they aren't telling about?
But
it's nothing new. They were hanging
anarchists in the early
1900s. They were doing studies on mass mind control during
the '40s and '50s (the Macy
Conferences &
MKULTRA),
right about the time they started dumping
nuclear waste left over from making their missiles into
your drinking water. COINTELPRO was
targeting activist groups 40 years ago. Reagan was
funding death
squads in the '80s. Now
they've begun to take the steps towards overt military
dictatorship, and people are just standing around and
watching like it's just another story about Britney Spear's
drug problems. Maybe we should stop pretending like this
"democracy" concept is anything other than a lie to keep
people passively hoping that the billionaires that make up
these ridiculous laws will begin to do the "right thing".
Let's be honest, and call it what it really is -- a
technologically advanced police state.
The rich and their
military goons are moving towards complete domination of
every aspect of your life. They are watching everything you
do. They are threatening you with torture &
imprisonment. This "biometric database" is just one more
step in that direction. They aren't showing any signs of
stopping voluntarily.
What
are you going to do about it?
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/12/3...